Joystiq
Joystiq News
The UK government will its Online Safety Bill with measures designed to prohibit abuse of intimate images, whether or not they're real. If the bill becomes law as is, it will be illegal to share porn without the subject's consent. This would be the first ban on sharing deepfakes in the country and if the law comes into effect, violating this rule could lead to a prison sentence.
Additionally, the Ministry of Justice aims to ban "downblousing," which it describes as an incident "where photos are taken down a woman’s top without consent." The country , which are exactly what the term suggests, in 2019. Furthermore, the government wants to make it illegal to install certain equipment, including hidden cameras, to capture images of someone without their consent.
The UK in 2015 and the government is aiming to expand the scope to make it illegal for anyone to share any intimate image of someone without consent. As it stands, prosecutors have to prove that the perpetrator had "intent to cause distress." Based on recommendations from the Law Commission, the government also intends to establish two additional serious offenses, which are "based on intent to cause humiliation, alarm, or distress and for obtaining sexual gratification." Officials already intended to , or sending unsolicited nudes, as part of the Online Safety Bill.
"We must do more to protect women and girls, from people who take or manipulate intimate photos in order to hound or humiliate them," Dominic Raab, the deputy prime minister and secretary of state for justice, said. "Our changes will give police and prosecutors the powers they need to bring these cowards to justice and safeguard women and girls from such vile abuse."
The government hasn't yet released the text of the amended Online Safety Bill. "The government will bring forward the wider package of changes as soon as parliamentary time allows and will announce further details in due course," the Ministry of Justice said. The bill has been delayed several times but it's set to .
As notes, though, finding parliamentary time to formally , then to eventually debate and vote on it, may not be easy. It's unclear whether the government will be able to pass the legislation before the next general election is called within the next two years.
Critics have pushed back against certain aspects of the bill, including a revived plan to before permitting them to access adult content online. , that measure may not be workable in practice.
The proposed legislation has also been described as a threat to free speech. On Thursday, to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak signed by 70 cyber security experts, organizations and elected officials laid out some of the dangers to privacy and security that the bill poses. Among other issues, the signatories argued that the Online Safety Bill includes "clauses that would erode end-to-end encryption in private messaging." The letter adds that UK businesses would have less data flow protection than counterparts in the US and EU, "leaving them more susceptible to cyberattacks and intellectual property theft."
"The bill is a deeply flawed censorship proposal that would allow UK residents to be thrown in jail for what they say online," the Electronic Frontier Foundation . "It would also force online service providers to use government-approved software to search for user content that is deemed to be related to terrorism or child abuse. In the process, it will undermine our right to have a private conversation, and the technologies that protect that right, like end-to-end encryption."
Console Bang News!
Additionally, the Ministry of Justice aims to ban "downblousing," which it describes as an incident "where photos are taken down a woman’s top without consent." The country , which are exactly what the term suggests, in 2019. Furthermore, the government wants to make it illegal to install certain equipment, including hidden cameras, to capture images of someone without their consent.
The UK in 2015 and the government is aiming to expand the scope to make it illegal for anyone to share any intimate image of someone without consent. As it stands, prosecutors have to prove that the perpetrator had "intent to cause distress." Based on recommendations from the Law Commission, the government also intends to establish two additional serious offenses, which are "based on intent to cause humiliation, alarm, or distress and for obtaining sexual gratification." Officials already intended to , or sending unsolicited nudes, as part of the Online Safety Bill.
"We must do more to protect women and girls, from people who take or manipulate intimate photos in order to hound or humiliate them," Dominic Raab, the deputy prime minister and secretary of state for justice, said. "Our changes will give police and prosecutors the powers they need to bring these cowards to justice and safeguard women and girls from such vile abuse."
The government hasn't yet released the text of the amended Online Safety Bill. "The government will bring forward the wider package of changes as soon as parliamentary time allows and will announce further details in due course," the Ministry of Justice said. The bill has been delayed several times but it's set to .
As notes, though, finding parliamentary time to formally , then to eventually debate and vote on it, may not be easy. It's unclear whether the government will be able to pass the legislation before the next general election is called within the next two years.
Critics have pushed back against certain aspects of the bill, including a revived plan to before permitting them to access adult content online. , that measure may not be workable in practice.
The proposed legislation has also been described as a threat to free speech. On Thursday, to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak signed by 70 cyber security experts, organizations and elected officials laid out some of the dangers to privacy and security that the bill poses. Among other issues, the signatories argued that the Online Safety Bill includes "clauses that would erode end-to-end encryption in private messaging." The letter adds that UK businesses would have less data flow protection than counterparts in the US and EU, "leaving them more susceptible to cyberattacks and intellectual property theft."
"The bill is a deeply flawed censorship proposal that would allow UK residents to be thrown in jail for what they say online," the Electronic Frontier Foundation . "It would also force online service providers to use government-approved software to search for user content that is deemed to be related to terrorism or child abuse. In the process, it will undermine our right to have a private conversation, and the technologies that protect that right, like end-to-end encryption."
Console Bang News!